The Massachusetts Gaming Commission is beginning to ramp up its evaluation of licensed Massachusetts sports betting operators’ use of artificial intelligence in the Commonwealth and how it affects their customer base.

Last month, Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman (MGC) Jordan Maynard announced the planned evaluations , based on a recent The New York Times report in which it investigated DraftKings’ use of artificial intelligence and machine learning, alleging the company used the technology to intentionally target gamblers likeliest to lose.

The commission will begin its interviews of licensed sports betting operators and their use of artificial intelligence next week.

MGC Executive Director Dean Serpa today informed the commission that its sports wagering division has already started reviewing each licensed sports betting operators’ privacy policies, required disclosures related to the use of machine learning, as well as its internal controls related to artificial intelligence.

A series of questions regarding the use of artificial intelligence have been crafted and will be sent to each of the Commonwealth’s seven online sports betting operators.

“Additionally, after our call our internal team has met twice since (Sept. 24) and we’ve prepared a comprehensive list of questions designed to bring us additional focused information on the topic. We plan to have that letter out earlier next week to all the operators,” Serpa said.

The MGC also plans to interview representatives from each operator in person on how artificial intelligence is used in such practices as customer acquisition, promotions, and responsible gaming. These interviews, Serpa said, will begin next week.

The MGC announced the planned evaluation during its Sept. 24 commission meeting, prompted by a New York Times report in which it investigated DraftKings’ use of artificial intelligence and machine learning, alleging the company used the technology to intentionally target gamblers likeliest to lose.

From a quantitative market efficiency and handicapping perspective, the storyline surrounding "Massachusetts Ramping Up Evaluation of Sports Betting Operator AI Use" highlights how sharp line movement and consensus ticket volume dictate value across Premier League Insights. Syndicate models track meaningful reverse line movement, indicating that institutional bookmakers are proactively hedging against sharp multi-leg risk.

Expected Value (+EV) models tracking this matchup project noticeable variance across key spread, total, and moneyline derivatives. Disciplined bankroll preservation principles and closing line value (CLV) benchmarks remain paramount as liquidity shifts heading into opening whistle.

Editorial Fact-Check & Verification Note: This briefing was curated, corroborated, and synthesized by the SportsBet Insights Live Editorial Desk. Readers following "Massachusetts Ramping Up Evaluation of Sports Betting Operator AI Use" are encouraged to review the full primary source coverage linked below for complete historical context, direct quotes, and official statements.